Editor’s Pick – Analyzing the Impact of Modeling Choices and Assumptions in Compartmental Epidemiological Models
Özgür Özmen2 , James J. Nutaro1 , Laura L. Pullman1 , and Arvind Ramanathan2 ,
Abstract
Computational disease spread models can be broadly classified into differential equation-based (EBM) and agent-based models (ABM). We examine these models in the context of illuminating their hidden assumptions and the impact these may have on the model outcomes. Drawing relevant conclusions about usability of a model requires reliable information regarding its modeling strategy and its associated assumptions. Hence, we aim to provide clear guidelines on development of these models and delineate important modeling choices that causes the differences between the model outputs. In this study, we present a quantitative analysis of how the choice of model trajectories and temporal resolution (continuous versus discrete-event models), coupling between agents (instantaneous versus delayed interactions), and progress of patients from one stage of disease to the other affect the overall outcomes of modeling disease spread. Our study reveals that the magnitude and velocity of the simulated epidemic depends critically on the selection of modeling principles, various assumptions of disease process, and the choice of time advance. In order to inform public health officials and improve reproducibility, these initial decisions of modelers should be carefully considered and recorded when building and documenting an agent-based model.
Recent Posts
- Misinformation Making a Disease Outbreak Worse: Outcomes Compared for Influenza, Monkey Pox, and Norovirus
- Assessing the Cognitive Complexity of Cyber Range Environments
- Toward reproducible disease models using the Systems Biology Markup Language
- The 2018 SCS Editor’s Choice Award has been Announced!
- Cyber threat assessment via attack scenario simulation using an integrated adversary and network modeling approach